Radeon RX Vega XL vs R7 Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameSpectreVega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 January 2014 (12 years ago)8 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123584
Core clock speed720 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed836 MHz1630 MHz
Number of transistors2,410 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate23.04365.1
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPSno data
ROPs864
TMUs32224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1890 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.2.170-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2014 8 August 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 225 Watt

R7 Graphics has 800% lower power consumption.

RX Vega XL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 Graphics and Radeon RX Vega XL. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD Radeon RX Vega XL
Radeon RX Vega XL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1809 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 Graphics or Radeon RX Vega XL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.