P106-100 vs Radeon R7 Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated331
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.82
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameSpectreGP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 January 2014 (11 years ago)19 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121280
Core clock speed720 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed836 MHz1709 MHz
Number of transistors2,410 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate23.04136.7
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPS4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs3280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.2.1701.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2014 19 June 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 120 Watt

R7 Graphics has 380% lower power consumption.

P106-100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 Graphics and P106-100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 Graphics is a desktop card while P106-100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Radeon R7 Graphics
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1525 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 209 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 Graphics or P106-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.