ATI FirePro V7800 vs Radeon R7 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameSpectreCypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 January 2014 (12 years ago)26 April 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$759

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121440
Core clock speed720 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed836 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,410 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate23.0450.40
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPS2.016 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3272
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2014 26 April 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 150 Watt

R7 Graphics has an age advantage of 3 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 Graphics and FirePro V7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V7800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1841 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate FirePro V7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 Graphics or FirePro V7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.