UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Place in the ranking	762	569
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	29.50
Architecture	GCN (2012−2015)	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Kaveri Spectre	Comet Lake GT2
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	14 January 2014 (10 years ago)	13 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	192
Core clock speed	720 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	28.80
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	3
TMUs	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	no data	System Shared
Memory bus width	no data	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−94.4%

35−40
+94.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
+200%

2−3

−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Hitman 3	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +188%	8−9 −188%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +39.3%	27−30 −39.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Hitman 3	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +188%	8−9 −188%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27 +200%	9−10 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +39.3%	27−30 −39.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Hitman 3	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +188%	8−9 −188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −50%	9−10 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +39.3%	27−30 −39.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−100%

14−16

+100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Hitman 3	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+200%

2−3

−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

This is how R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics P630 is 94% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is 300% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games: