Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) vs R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Place in the ranking	769	837
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	3.76
Architecture	GCN (2012−2015)	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code name	Kaveri Spectre	Bristol Ridge
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	14 January 2014 (10 years ago)	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	384
Core clock speed	720 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	800 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	3100 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	12-45 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

no data

medium sized

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width	no data	64/128 Bit
Shared memory	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12 (FL 12_0)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 3.04
+25.1%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 2.43

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 2302
+33.8%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 1720

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1616
+25.9%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 1284

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 10341
+25.3%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 8256

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 91999
+58.6%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 58018

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

18
+63.6%

−63.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
+20%

5−6

−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +50%	4 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Hitman 3	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +0%	7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +5.4%	35−40 −5.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Hitman 3	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27 +108%	13 −108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +5.4%	35−40 −5.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Hitman 3	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −117%	12−14 +117%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +5.4%	35−40 −5.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+16.7%

6−7

−16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+20%

5−6

−20%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

This is how R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and R5 (Bristol Ridge) compete in popular games:

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is 64% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is 300% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R5 (Bristol Ridge) is 117% faster.

All in all, in popular games: