UHD Graphics 770 vs Radeon R7 370

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 370 and UHD Graphics 770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 370
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 110 Watt
11.64
+89.6%

R7 370 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking420590
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.65no data
Power efficiency7.3228.30
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTrinidadRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024256
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate62.4026.40
Floating-point processing power1.997 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed975 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 370 11.64
+89.6%
UHD Graphics 770 6.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 370 4499
+343%
UHD Graphics 770 1016

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 370 8519
UHD Graphics 770 16443
+93%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 370 28723
+982%
UHD Graphics 770 2655

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 370 5961
+73.9%
UHD Graphics 770 3428

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 370 39809
UHD Graphics 770 119185
+199%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+161%
18
−161%
1440p57
+90%
30−35
−90%
4K20
+53.8%
13
−53.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.17no data
1440p2.61no data
4K7.45no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+80%
15
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+109%
11
−109%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+145%
11
−145%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+130%
10
−130%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+118%
17
−118%
Fortnite 106
+203%
35−40
−203%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+80.8%
24−27
−80.8%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
+72.7%
21−24
−72.7%
Valorant 100−105
+49.3%
65−70
−49.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+233%
6
−233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+64.9%
95−100
−64.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Dota 2 75−80
+76.7%
43
−76.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+131%
16
−131%
Fortnite 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+80.8%
24−27
−80.8%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+389%
9
−389%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+340%
5
−340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+94.4%
18
−94.4%
Valorant 100−105
+49.3%
65−70
−49.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Dota 2 75−80
+90%
40
−90%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+164%
14
−164%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+80.8%
24−27
−80.8%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+77.3%
21−24
−77.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+144%
9
−144%
Valorant 20
−235%
65−70
+235%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 81
+84.1%
40−45
−84.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+64.9%
35−40
−64.9%
Valorant 120−130
+84.6%
65−70
−84.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
+114%
21−24
−114%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Valorant 55−60
+100%
27−30
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 40−45
+186%
14
−186%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how R7 370 and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • R7 370 is 161% faster in 1080p
  • R7 370 is 90% faster in 1440p
  • R7 370 is 54% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 370 is 389% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 235% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 370 is ahead in 61 test (95%)
  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.64 6.14
Recency 18 June 2015 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 15 Watt

R7 370 has a 89.6% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 370
Radeon R7 370
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 485 votes

Rate Radeon R7 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1299 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 370 or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.