FirePro V7900 SDI vs Radeon R7 360 896SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameTobagoCayman
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)24 May 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961280
Core clock speed1100 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt224 Watt
Texture fill rate61.6058.00
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs5680
L1 Cache224 KB320 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length183 mm279 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s160 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x SDI
HDMI+-
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2015 24 May 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 224 Watt

R7 360 896SP has an age advantage of 4 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 164% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 360 896SP and FirePro V7900 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 360 896SP is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V7900 SDI is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon R7 360 896SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 360 896SP or FirePro V7900 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.