Radeon HD 6750M vs R7 265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
240 240 OEM 250 250 OEM 250E 250X 250XE 260 260X 265 265X OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6610M 6625M 6630M 6630M Mac Edition 6650M 6730M 6750M 6770M 6770M Mac Edition 7610M 7650M Rebrand 7670M Rebrand

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 265 with Radeon HD 6750M, including specs and performance data.

R7 265
2014, $149
4 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
9.68
+332%

R7 265 outperforms HD 6750M by a whopping 332% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 265 R7 265
HD 6750M HD 6750M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking493909
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.70no data
Power efficiency4.964.92
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code namePitcairnWhistler
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 February 2014 (11 years ago)4 January 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024480
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate59.2014.40
Floating-point processing power1.894 TFLOPS0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6424
L1 Cache256 KB48 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p90−95
+329%
21
−329%
Full HD100−110
+317%
24
−317%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.49no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how R7 265 and HD 6750M compete in popular games:

  • R7 265 is 329% faster in 900p
  • R7 265 is 317% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.68 2.24
Recency 13 February 2014 4 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

R7 265 has a 332.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6750M, on the other hand, has 328.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 265 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6750M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 265 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 6750M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265
AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Radeon HD 6750M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 265 Radeon R7 265
vs
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
HD 6750M Radeon HD 6750M
vs
HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 620
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
vs
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
R7 250X Radeon R7 250X
vs
HD 8400E Radeon HD 8400E
R7 250X Radeon R7 250X
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 AGP Edition All-In-Wonder 2006 AGP Edition
R7 250X Radeon R7 250X
vs
Arc Pro A60 Arc Pro A60
R7 250X Radeon R7 250X
vs
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 2 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
vs
HD 6770M Radeon HD 6770M
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
vs
HD 6730M Radeon HD 6730M
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
vs
HD 7650M Rebrand Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
vs
HD 6625M Radeon HD 6625M
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
vs
9800 GT Rebrand GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
vs
R5 M250 Radeon R5 M250

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 385 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 60 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 265 or Radeon HD 6750M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.