Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile vs R7 260X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking507not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.57no data
Power efficiency4.93no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBonaireRenoir
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896384
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate61.6036.00
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS1.152 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs5624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth104 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 384SP Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 260X and Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 260X is a desktop card while Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 260X
Radeon R7 260X
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 393 votes

Rate Radeon R7 260X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.