ATI Radeon HD 3450 X2 vs R7 260
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 548 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.25 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.41 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | Bonaire | RV620 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | reference | no data |
| Release date | 17 December 2013 (11 years ago) | 10 December 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 40 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,080 million | 181 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 2.400 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.536 TFLOPS | 0.048 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 16 | 4 ×2 |
| TMUs | 48 | 4 ×2 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | 8 GB/s ×2 |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DMS-59 |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| DisplayPort support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| DDMA audio | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 December 2013 | 10 December 2007 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 50 Watt |
R7 260 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.
ATI HD 3450 X2, on the other hand, has 130% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 260 and Radeon HD 3450 X2. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
