Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon R6 (Mullins)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R6 (Mullins)
2014
0.55

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 1087% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1207541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.57
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameMullinsTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12880
Core clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R6 (Mullins) 0.55
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 6.53
+1087%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R6 (Mullins) 2258
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21931
+871%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R6 (Mullins) 20511
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 166479
+712%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%
1440p0−19
4K1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1050%
23
+1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
Valorant 27−30
−162%
75−80
+162%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−500%
12
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−533%
110−120
+533%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10
+400%
Dota 2 12−14
−225%
39
+225%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%
Metro Exodus 0−1 12
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−450%
22
+450%
Valorant 27−30
−162%
75−80
+162%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9
+350%
Dota 2 12−14
−200%
36
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−175%
11
+175%
Valorant 27−30
−162%
75−80
+162%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−900%
10
+900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 6−7
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Valorant 4−5
−800%
35−40
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21
+0%
21
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12
+0%
12
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how R6 (Mullins) and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1800% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 2650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 31 test (53%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 6.53
Recency 29 April 2014 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 1087.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R6 (Mullins) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 959 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R6 (Mullins) or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.