Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Radeon R5 M430

Place in the ranking	937	609
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	15.09
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Exo	Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	64
Core clock speed	1030 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	690 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.60	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.6592 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	20	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12_1
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M430 1.68

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.41
+222%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R5 M430 1689

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4187
+148%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R5 M430 4697

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 14442
+207%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R5 M430 1004

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 2743
+173%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R5 M430 5493

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 16713
+204%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−30.8%

17
+30.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−125%

9−10
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Battlefield 5	0−1	14−16
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −500%	12 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −125%	9 +125%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%
Hitman 3	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −300%	12 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −122%	20−22 +122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −61.8%	55 +61.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Battlefield 5	0−1	14−16
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −450%	11 +450%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +0%	4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%
Hitman 3	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −200%	9 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −88.9%	17 +88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −50%	51 +50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%
Hitman 3	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +45.5%	11 −45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −66.7%	15 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +33.3%	9 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −41.2%	45−50 +41.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−400%

14−16
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−150%

10−11
+150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−300%

4−5
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	2−3
Far Cry 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−100%

6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Metro Exodus	18 +0%	18 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Metro Exodus	14 +0%	14 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

This is how R5 M430 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 31% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R5 M430 is 45% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 620% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

R5 M430 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is ahead in 48 tests (74%)
there's a draw in 15 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.68	5.41
Recency	15 May 2016	28 May 2019
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 222% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M430 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.