GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R5 M335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M335 with GeForce RTX 3070, including specs and performance data.

R5 M335
2015
4 GB DDR3
1.42

RTX 3070 outperforms R5 M335 by a whopping 3983% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking100242
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.60
Power efficiencyno data18.07
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameExoGA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date21 October 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3205888
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed1070 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1070 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors690 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown220 Watt
Texture fill rate21.40317.4
Floating-point processing power0.6848 TFLOPS20.31 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs20184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan+1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M335 1.42
RTX 3070 57.98
+3983%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M335 548
RTX 3070 22342
+3977%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R5 M335 1784
RTX 3070 43005
+2311%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R5 M335 4772
RTX 3070 88744
+1760%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R5 M335 911
RTX 3070 31020
+3305%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R5 M335 4590
RTX 3070 154864
+3274%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R5 M335 70485
RTX 3070 502470
+613%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−1390%
149
+1390%
1440p2−3
−4850%
99
+4850%
4K1−2
−6000%
61
+6000%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.35
1440pno data5.04
4Kno data8.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3575%
147
+3575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1983%
125
+1983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2625%
100−110
+2625%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3375%
139
+3375%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7367%
220−230
+7367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1717%
109
+1717%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5800%
118
+5800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2813%
230−240
+2813%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−427%
174
+427%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2625%
100−110
+2625%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3050%
126
+3050%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7367%
220−230
+7367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1833%
116
+1833%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5600%
110−120
+5600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3088%
255
+3088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−656%
120−130
+656%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−439%
178
+439%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1250%
81
+1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2625%
100−110
+2625%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2450%
102
+2450%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7367%
220−230
+7367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1750%
111
+1750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1107%
181
+1107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2688%
223
+2688%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−3933%
121
+3933%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−158%
85
+158%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5700%
116
+5700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−6150%
120−130
+6150%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6700%
68
+6700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
62
+6100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3300%
65−70
+3300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1271%
96
+1271%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−2820%
146
+2820%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−9700%
95−100
+9700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−2400%
175
+2400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2750%
114
+2750%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4200%
43
+4200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 40−45
Far Cry 5 0−1 35−40

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2200%
69
+2200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
+0%
100
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
+0%
87
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+0%
78
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
+0%
65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 101
+0%
101
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
+0%
166
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 52
+0%
52
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+0%
90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+0%
97
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
+0%
38
+0%

This is how R5 M335 and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 1390% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 is 4850% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 is 6000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3070 is 9700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 57.98
Recency 21 October 2015 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX 3070 has a 3983.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M335 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M335 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M335
Radeon R5 M335
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 141 vote

Rate Radeon R5 M335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11305 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.