Arc A750 vs Radeon R5 M330

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M330 with Arc A750, including specs and performance data.

R5 M330
2015
4 GB DDR3, 18 Watt
1.54

Arc A750 outperforms R5 M330 by a whopping 1919% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking967176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.32
Power efficiency5.929.56
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameExoDG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203584
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed955 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors690 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60537.6
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs20224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M330 1.54
Arc A750 31.09
+1919%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M330 595
Arc A750 11995
+1916%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R5 M330 1689
Arc A750 37288
+2108%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R5 M330 922
Arc A750 29667
+3118%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R5 M330 4897
Arc A750 130715
+2569%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−1122%
110
+1122%
1440p2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
4K1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.63
1440pno data4.90
4Kno data8.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−933%
62
+933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−2600%
100−110
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4950%
200−210
+4950%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1467%
90−95
+1467%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1087%
170−180
+1087%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3200%
95−100
+3200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1963%
160−170
+1963%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−297%
130−140
+297%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1667%
106
+1667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−2600%
100−110
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4950%
200−210
+4950%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1467%
90−95
+1467%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1087%
170−180
+1087%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3200%
95−100
+3200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2888%
239
+2888%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−600%
90−95
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−297%
130−140
+297%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−650%
45
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90
+2150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1467%
90−95
+1467%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−653%
113
+653%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2388%
199
+2388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−527%
69
+527%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−85.3%
63
+85.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3200%
95−100
+3200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−4200%
85−90
+4200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3700%
38
+3700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 50−55
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Hitman 3 7−8
−729%
55−60
+729%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1740%
92
+1740%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−2450%
200−210
+2450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1800%
75−80
+1800%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 27−30
Far Cry 5 0−1 24−27

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90
+0%
90
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+0%
69
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 86
+0%
86
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 145
+0%
145
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 80
+0%
80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
+0%
69
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 61
+0%
61
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+0%
84
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
+0%
30
+0%

This is how R5 M330 and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 1122% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 2850% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 3500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A750 is 5600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is ahead in 44 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.54 31.09
Recency 5 May 2015 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 225 Watt

R5 M330 has 1150% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 1918.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M330 is a notebook card while Arc A750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M330
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 1009 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 797 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.