ATI Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP vs R5 M255
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1016 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | Topaz Pro / Sun | RS780 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 May 2014 (10 years ago) | 4 March 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 40 |
| Compute units | 5 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 940 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 180 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 | 2.000 |
| Floating-point performance | 0.7219 gflops | 0.04 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 11 | 10.0 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.0 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| Mantle | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2014 | 4 March 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
R5 M255 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M255 and Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R5 M255 is a notebook card while Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
