Radeon Instinct MI200 vs R5 M240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1109not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameJetAldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 September 2014 (11 years ago)December 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3206656
Core clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors690 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60707.2
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs20416
L1 Cache80 KB1.6 MB
L2 Cache128 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount0 MB64 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1,638 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 11N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

Instinct MI200 has a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 and Radeon Instinct MI200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 57 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 12 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 or Radeon Instinct MI200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.