Tesla P40 vs Radeon R5 Graphics
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 231 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.01 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.52 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Spectre SL | GP102 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 September 2014 (11 years ago) | 13 September 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $5,699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 3840 |
| Core clock speed | 497 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 720 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,410 million | 11,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 7.952 | 367.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.2545 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 96 |
| TMUs | 16 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 8-pin EPS |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1808 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 347.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 September 2014 | 13 September 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
R5 Graphics has 1566.7% lower power consumption.
Tesla P40, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and Tesla P40. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Tesla P40 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
