ATI Radeon 7200 vs R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameSpectre SLR100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 September 2014 (11 years ago)1 April 2000 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed497 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,410 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate7.9521
Floating-point processing power0.2545 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs166

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.312 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)7.0
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 September 2014 1 April 2000
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

R5 Graphics has an age advantage of 14 years, a 543% more advanced lithography process, and 53% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1821 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.