Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.56
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameSpectre SLG72
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date17 September 2014 (11 years ago)13 March 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2567
Core clock speed497 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors2,410 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate7.9521.800
Floating-point processing power0.2545 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared450 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.03.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 September 2014 13 March 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm

R5 Graphics has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and Quadro FX 350M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1824 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or Quadro FX 350M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.