UHD Graphics 730 vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

R5 (Bristol Ridge)
2016
12 Watt
2.44

UHD Graphics 730 outperforms R5 (Bristol Ridge) by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking839687
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Power efficiency3.7219.01
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−50%
18−21
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 4
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

This is how R5 (Bristol Ridge) and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 is 50% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.44 4.16
Recency 1 June 2016 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

R5 (Bristol Ridge) has 25% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 730, on the other hand, has a 70.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1273 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.