Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking837not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.77no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeCedar Trail
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844
Boost clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width64/128 Bitno data
Shared memory++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 1 November 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

R5 (Bristol Ridge) has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 24 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 134 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.