Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM

Place in the ranking	804	684
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.70	19.10
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	Oland	Broadwell GT3e
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 June 2016 (8 years ago)	5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	384
Core clock speed	730 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	780 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.72	38.40
Floating-point processing power	0.599 TFLOPS	0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	6
TMUs	24	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	IGP
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1150 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	36.8 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 430 OEM 2.67

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 4.14
+55.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 430 OEM 1031

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1599
+55.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.67	4.14
Recency	30 June 2016	5 September 2014
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt

R5 430 OEM has an age advantage of 1 year.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300, on the other hand, has a 55.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 430 OEM in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.