ATI Radeon X800 vs R5 340X OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.51
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameOlandR430
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate21.604.800
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 1 October 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

R5 340X OEM has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X800, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 340X OEM and Radeon X800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Radeon R5 340X OEM
ATI Radeon X800
Radeon X800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 461 vote

Rate Radeon R5 340X OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 38 votes

Rate Radeon X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.