Radeon Instinct MI300 vs R5 230

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1203not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.08no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameCaicosAqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16014080
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors370 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate5.0001,496
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs8880
Tensor Coresno data880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/A2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 11N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 600 Watt

R5 230 has 3057.9% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 230 is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 237 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.