ATI Radeon DDR VIVO vs R5 230

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1206not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.07no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameCaicosRage 6
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (10 years ago)14 August 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speedno data183 MHz
Number of transistors370 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.0001.098
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs86

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data183 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s5.856 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x VGA, 2x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 117.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

R5 230 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and Radeon DDR VIVO. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230
ATI Radeon DDR VIVO
Radeon DDR VIVO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 237 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon DDR VIVO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.