GeForce2 GTS PRO vs Radeon R5 230

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1214not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameCaicosNV15 A5
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (10 years ago)26 April 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speedno data200 MHz
Number of transistors370 million25 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.0001.600
Floating-point performance0.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/ANone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x VGA, 2x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 117.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 26 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

R5 230 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and GeForce2 GTS PRO. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230
NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS PRO
GeForce2 GTS PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 222 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate GeForce2 GTS PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.