Radeon RX 7600 XT vs R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) with Radeon RX 7600 XT, including specs and performance data.

R4 (Stoney Ridge)
2016
15 Watt
1.17

RX 7600 XT outperforms R4 (Stoney Ridge) by a whopping 3703% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking106879
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.59
Power efficiency5.4416.33
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speedno data1980 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz2755 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rateno data352.6
Floating-point processing powerno data22.57 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−3650%
300−350
+3650%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.10

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3567%
220−230
+3567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−3471%
500−550
+3471%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−3650%
1200−1250
+3650%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3567%
220−230
+3567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−3471%
500−550
+3471%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−3650%
1200−1250
+3650%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3567%
220−230
+3567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−3471%
500−550
+3471%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−3650%
1200−1250
+3650%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−3614%
260−270
+3614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

This is how R4 (Stoney Ridge) and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 XT is 3650% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 44.49
Recency 1 June 2016 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 190 Watt

R4 (Stoney Ridge) has 1166.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has a 3702.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 123 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 521 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.