ATI WinBoost vs Radeon R4 (Beema)
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1171 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.1 (2014) | Mach (1992−1997) |
| GPU code name | Beema | Mach64 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (11 years ago) | 1 November 1995 (30 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $229 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 40 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 600 nm |
| ROPs | no data | 1 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCI |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | EDO |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 40 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 320.0 MB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x VGA |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | N/A |
| OpenGL | no data | N/A |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 April 2014 | 1 November 1995 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 600 nm |
R4 (Beema) has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R4 (Beema) and WinBoost. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R4 (Beema) is a notebook graphics card while WinBoost is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
