Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated643
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.90
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameBeemaIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128512
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed655 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors930 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80032.00
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics 950 has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics and Iris Plus Graphics 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 51 votes

Rate Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics or Iris Plus Graphics 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.