GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated48
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.67
Power efficiencyno data18.51
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameBeemaGA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (9 years ago)1 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284864
Core clock speed600 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed655 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors930 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800253.1
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPS16.2 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8152
Tensor Coresno data152
Ray Tracing Coresno data38

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 1 December 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

R3 Mobile Graphics has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 44 votes

Rate Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15219 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.