ATI Graphics Ultra + vs Radeon R3 Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)no data
GPU code nameBeemaMach32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (9 years ago)1 January 1992 (32 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed267 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors930 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.800no data
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
WidthIGP1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)None
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL2.0None
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 1 January 1992
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

R3 Graphics has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 2757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3 Graphics and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Radeon R3 Graphics
ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 696 votes

Rate Radeon R3 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.