GeForce 705A vs Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1174not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.88no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeGF119
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)1 October 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12848
Core clock speedno data738 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors3100 Million292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.904
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1417 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 1 October 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R2 (Stoney Ridge) has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and GeForce 705A. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 43 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 5 votes

Rate GeForce 705A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) or GeForce 705A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.