RTX A5000 vs Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

Place in the ranking	1202	42
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	17.54
Architecture	GCN 1.1 (2014)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Beema/Mullins	GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	29 April 2014 (10 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	8192
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1170 MHz
Boost clock speed	600 MHz	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	433.9
Floating-point processing power	no data	27.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	96
TMUs	no data	256
Tensor Cores	no data	256
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	24 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	768.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −8900%	180−190 +8900%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −8471%	600−650 +8471%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −8900%	180−190 +8900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −8900%	180−190 +8900%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −8471%	600−650 +8471%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −8900%	180−190 +8900%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −8650%	350−400 +8650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −8650%	700−750 +8650%
Valorant	27−30 −8866%	2600−2650 +8866%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −8900%	180−190 +8900%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −8471%	600−650 +8471%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	18−20 −8789%	1600−1650 +8789%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −8900%	180−190 +8900%
Dota 2	12−14 −8650%	1050−1100 +8650%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −8650%	350−400 +8650%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −8650%	700−750 +8650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −8650%	350−400 +8650%
Valorant	27−30 −8866%	2600−2650 +8866%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −8471%	600−650 +8471%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −8900%	180−190 +8900%
Dota 2	12−14 −8650%	1050−1100 +8650%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −8650%	350−400 +8650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −8650%	700−750 +8650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −8650%	350−400 +8650%
Valorant	27−30 −8866%	2600−2650 +8866%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	2−3 −8900%	180−190 +8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −8900%	270−280 +8900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −8900%	90−95 +8900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −8900%	90−95 +8900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

1−2

−8900%

90−95
+8900%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −8900%	1350−1400 +8900%
Valorant	4−5 −8650%	350−400 +8650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	1−2 −8900%	90−95 +8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −8900%	180−190 +8900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3
−8900%

180−190

+8900%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.65	58.85
Recency	29 April 2014	12 April 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm

RTX A5000 has a 8953.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) is a notebook card while RTX A5000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

RTX A5000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

HD Graphics 3000

RTX A5000

Quadro RTX A6000

Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

Radeon R6 (Mullins)

Mobility Radeon HD 4550

Mobility Radeon HD 5450

HD Graphics 2000

GeForce 405M

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

HD 6320

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.9 325 votes

Rate RTX A5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) or RTX A5000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.