GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

Place in the ranking	151	45
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.86	21.50
Power efficiency	10.30	15.54
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Vega 10	TU102
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 August 2018 (6 years ago)	20 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 8200 has 16% better value for money than RTX 2080 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	4352
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1545 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	336.0	420.2
Floating-point processing power	10.75 TFLOPS	13.45 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	88
TMUs	224	272
Tensor Cores	no data	544
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	11 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	352 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	616.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 8200 34.40

RTX 2080 Ti 56.42
+64%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 8200 13224

RTX 2080 Ti 21689
+64%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 −65%	165 +65%
1440p	70−75 −74.3%	122 +74.3%
4K	55−60 −69.1%	93 +69.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	9.99 −65%	6.05 +65%
1440p	14.27 −74.3%	8.19 +74.3%
4K	18.16 −69.1%	10.74 +69.1%

RTX 2080 Ti has 65% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 2080 Ti has 74% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 2080 Ti has 69% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Elden Ring	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	85 +0%	85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	57 +0%	57 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
Metro Exodus	110 +0%	110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	106 +0%	106 +0%
Valorant	290 +0%	290 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	235 +0%	235 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +0%	54 +0%
Dota 2	138 +0%	138 +0%
Elden Ring	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Far Cry 5	92 +0%	92 +0%
Fortnite	224 +0%	224 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	134 +0%	134 +0%
Metro Exodus	100 +0%	100 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	249 +0%	249 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90 +0%	90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	170 +0%	170 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 +0%	74 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	48 +0%	48 +0%
Dota 2	141 +0%	141 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	183 +0%	183 +0%
Valorant	259 +0%	259 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Elden Ring	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	63 +0%	63 +0%
World of Tanks	350−400 +0%	350−400 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 +0%	74 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +0%	32 +0%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Metro Exodus	98 +0%	98 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Valorant	204 +0%	204 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Dota 2	142 +0%	142 +0%
Elden Ring	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	142 +0%	142 +0%
Metro Exodus	51 +0%	51 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	209 +0%	209 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 +0%	42 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	142 +0%	142 +0%
World of Tanks	270 +0%	270 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	62 +0%	62 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +0%	16 +0%
Dota 2	139 +0%	139 +0%
Far Cry 5	105 +0%	105 +0%
Fortnite	96 +0%	96 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Valorant	113 +0%	113 +0%

This is how Pro WX 8200 and RTX 2080 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Ti is 65% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 Ti is 74% faster in 1440p
RTX 2080 Ti is 69% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.40	56.42
Recency	13 August 2018	20 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	11 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	250 Watt

Pro WX 8200 has 8.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Ti, on the other hand, has a 64% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 37.5% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 8200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.