GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 8200 with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 8200
2018
8 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
35.83
+0.4%

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking122125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.3946.63
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10N18E-G2R
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (5 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data
Current price$2172 (2.2x MSRP)$812

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q has 349% better value for money than Pro WX 8200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842560
Core clock speed1200 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0184.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 8200 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz11000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s352.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.140
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 8200 35.83
+0.4%
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 35.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 8200 13835
+0.4%
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 13778

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−7%
107
+7%
1440p75−80
+0%
75
+0%
4K45−50
−4.4%
47
+4.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 99
+4.2%
95−100
−4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+4.5%
110−120
−4.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 127
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 137
+5.4%
130−140
−5.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+7.7%
130−140
−7.7%
Hitman 3 103
+3%
100−105
−3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 163
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
Metro Exodus 144
+2.9%
140−150
−2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+9%
100−105
−9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+3.8%
130−140
−3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 96
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+7.7%
65−70
−7.7%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+4.5%
110−120
−4.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 91
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 108
+8%
100−105
−8%
Far Cry New Dawn 97
+2.1%
95−100
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+7.7%
130−140
−7.7%
Hitman 3 51
+2%
50−55
−2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+2.9%
140−150
−2.9%
Metro Exodus 121
+0.8%
120−130
−0.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 98
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+3.8%
130−140
−3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+1.4%
140−150
−1.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+7.7%
130−140
−7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
+4%
100−105
−4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+3.8%
130−140
−3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+7.1%
70−75
−7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+2.2%
90−95
−2.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 109
+9%
100−105
−9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 61
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Hitman 3 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Metro Exodus 75
+7.1%
70−75
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Hitman 3 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+2%
50−55
−2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Metro Exodus 44
+10%
40−45
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%

This is how Pro WX 8200 and RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 7% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.83 35.68
Recency 13 August 2018 2 April 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 80 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 8200 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 18 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 497 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.