Radeon R7 350 Fake Card vs Pro WX 8100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Opal
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 December 2017 (8 years ago)2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584384
Core clock speed1200 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate336.025.20
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs22424
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz4.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s36.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.46.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 35 Watt

Pro WX 8100 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350 Fake Card, on the other hand, has 557% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 8100 and Radeon R7 350 Fake Card. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 Fake Card is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 Fake Card on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8100 or Radeon R7 350 Fake Card, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.