RTX A1000 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

Place in the ranking	563	225
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.53	28.54
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Baffin	GA107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	2048
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	630 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	1140 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	72.96
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	56	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.83

RTX A1000 Mobile 24.56
+260%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4150 2658

RTX A1000 Mobile 9559
+260%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18−20 −272%	67 +272%
1440p	7−8 −286%	27 +286%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −408%	66 +408%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −336%	61 +336%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −245%	75−80 +245%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −285%	50 +285%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −78.6%	25 +78.6%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −289%	109 +289%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −313%	65−70 +313%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −261%	65−70 +261%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −170%	50−55 +170%
Valorant	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −245%	75−80 +245%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −223%	42 +223%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −28.6%	18 +28.6%
Dota 2	24−27 −308%	98 +308%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −139%	74 +139%
Fortnite	40−45 −205%	120−130 +205%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −211%	87 +211%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −313%	65−70 +313%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −279%	91 +279%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +12.5%	16 −12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −179%	150−160 +179%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −170%	50−55 +170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −286%	80−85 +286%
Valorant	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
World of Tanks	100−110 −140%	250−260 +140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −245%	75−80 +245%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −169%	35 +169%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −7.1%	15 +7.1%
Dota 2	24−27 −450%	132 +450%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −145%	75−80 +145%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −171%	76 +171%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −313%	65−70 +313%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −179%	150−160 +179%
Valorant	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 −425%	40−45 +425%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −425%	40−45 +425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −361%	170−180 +361%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
World of Tanks	50−55 −230%	160−170 +230%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −414%	70−75 +414%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −408%	65−70 +408%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −470%	55−60 +470%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Valorant	18−20 −272%	65−70 +272%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Dota 2	18−20 −139%	40−45 +139%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −153%	40−45 +153%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −280%	75−80 +280%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −153%	40−45 +153%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −333%	24−27 +333%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Dota 2	18−20 −139%	40−45 +139%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −313%	30−35 +313%
Fortnite	7−8 −343%	30−35 +343%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −375%	35−40 +375%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Valorant	6−7 −433%	30−35 +433%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A1000 Mobile is 272% faster in 1080p
RTX A1000 Mobile is 286% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 13% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
RTX A1000 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.83	24.56
Recency	1 March 2017	30 March 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt

Pro WX 4150 has 20% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 259.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.