ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with Radeon 9200 PRO, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
9.44
+94300%

Pro WX 4100 outperforms ATI 9200 PRO by a whopping 94300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4681530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.32no data
Power efficiency12.950.02
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameBaffinRV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)1 May 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1125 MHz239 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate76.860.96
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s5.248 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4100 9.44
+94300%
ATI 9200 PRO 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4100 3634
+181600%
ATI 9200 PRO 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 0.01
Recency 10 November 2016 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 28 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has a 94300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 78.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Radeon 9200 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 48 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.