GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4200 Radeon Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 8200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 770M GTX 770M SLI GTX 775M GTX 775M Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with GeForce GTX 770M SLI, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
9.50

GTX 770M SLI outperforms Pro WX 4100 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
GTX 770M SLI GTX 770M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking467393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.47no data
Power efficiency13.085.87
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameBaffinno data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)30 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241920
Core clock speed1125 MHz811 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million2x 2540 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate76.86no data
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2x 192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Elden Ring 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Elden Ring 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
World of Tanks 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Elden Ring 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
World of Tanks 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Elden Ring 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.50 12.78
Recency 10 November 2016 30 May 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

GTX 770M SLI, on the other hand, has a 34.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
GTX 770M SLI GeForce GTX 770M SLI
vs
R9 M395 Radeon R9 M395
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
P104-100 P104 100
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
MX450 25W GeForce MX450 25W
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce 930M GeForce 930M
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
GT 740M GeForce GT 740M
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680
GT 750M Mac Edition GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
vs
R7 M465X Radeon R7 M465X
GTX 960A GTX 960A
vs
GTX 950A 950A
R9 M375X Radeon R9 M375X
vs
R7 M370 Radeon R7 M370
Xbox One S GPU Xbox One S GPU
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 48 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.