Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking465not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.17no data
Power efficiency13.19no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameBaffinPonte Vecchio
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416384
Core clock speed1125 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate76.861,638
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs16no data
TMUs641024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 600 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has 1100% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max 1550, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Data Center GPU Max 1550. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
Data Center GPU Max 1550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 48 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 21 vote

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.