RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro W6800

Place in the ranking	51	3
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.60	no data
Power efficiency	14.24	21.76
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 21	AD102
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)	5 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,249	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	14080
Core clock speed	2075 MHz	975 MHz
Boost clock speed	2320 MHz	2460 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	556.8	1,082
Floating-point processing power	17.82 TFLOPS	69.27 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	176
TMUs	240	440
Tensor Cores	no data	440
Ray Tracing Cores	60	110

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	864.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

6x mini-DisplayPort

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6800 51.58

RTX 5880 Ada Generation 89.90
+74.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6800 19832

RTX 5880 Ada Generation 34568
+74.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	157 −72%	270−280 +72%
1440p	120 −66.7%	200−210 +66.7%
4K	93 −72%	160−170 +72%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	14.32	no data
1440p	18.74	no data
4K	24.18	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	110−120 −72.4%	200−210 +72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 −73.9%	200−210 +73.9%
Elden Ring	180−190 −58.7%	300−310 +58.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −72.4%	200−210 +72.4%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 −72.4%	200−210 +72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 −73.9%	200−210 +73.9%
Forza Horizon 4	282 −59.6%	450−500 +59.6%
Metro Exodus	61 −63.9%	100−105 +63.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 −66.7%	160−170 +66.7%
Valorant	210−220 −60.6%	350−400 +60.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −72.4%	200−210 +72.4%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 −72.4%	200−210 +72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 −73.9%	200−210 +73.9%
Dota 2	114 −66.7%	190−200 +66.7%
Elden Ring	180−190 −58.7%	300−310 +58.7%
Far Cry 5	45 −66.7%	75−80 +66.7%
Fortnite	200−210 −68.3%	350−400 +68.3%
Forza Horizon 4	277 −62.5%	450−500 +62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	121 −73.6%	210−220 +73.6%
Metro Exodus	116 −72.4%	200−210 +72.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 −62.8%	350−400 +62.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 −66.7%	160−170 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 −72.4%	300−310 +72.4%
Valorant	210−220 −60.6%	350−400 +60.6%
World of Tanks	270−280 −61.3%	450−500 +61.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −72.4%	200−210 +72.4%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 −72.4%	200−210 +72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 −73.9%	200−210 +73.9%
Dota 2	86 −62.8%	140−150 +62.8%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −72.7%	190−200 +72.7%
Forza Horizon 4	268 −67.9%	450−500 +67.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 −62.8%	350−400 +62.8%
Valorant	210−220 −60.6%	350−400 +60.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	88 −70.5%	150−160 +70.5%
Elden Ring	110−120 −70.9%	200−210 +70.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	88 −70.5%	150−160 +70.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −71.4%	300−310 +71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −69.6%	95−100 +69.6%
World of Tanks	300−350 −66.7%	550−600 +66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −66.7%	140−150 +66.7%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 −69.5%	100−105 +69.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −69.5%	100−105 +69.5%
Far Cry 5	150−160 −69.8%	270−280 +69.8%
Forza Horizon 4	212 −65.1%	350−400 +65.1%
Metro Exodus	55 −72.7%	95−100 +72.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 −68.3%	170−180 +68.3%
Valorant	180−190 −62.2%	300−310 +62.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 −72.4%	100−105 +72.4%
Dota 2	125 −68%	210−220 +68%
Elden Ring	55−60 −72.4%	100−105 +72.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	125 −68%	210−220 +68%
Metro Exodus	55 −72.7%	95−100 +72.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −69.5%	300−310 +69.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −62.2%	60−65 +62.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	125 −68%	210−220 +68%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −71.9%	110−120 +71.9%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 −72.4%	100−105 +72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −66.7%	45−50 +66.7%
Dota 2	94 −70.2%	160−170 +70.2%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −72.4%	150−160 +72.4%
Fortnite	80−85 −68.7%	140−150 +68.7%
Forza Horizon 4	126 −66.7%	210−220 +66.7%
Valorant	100−110 −66.7%	170−180 +66.7%

This is how Pro W6800 and RTX 5880 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 72% faster in 1080p
RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 67% faster in 1440p
RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 72% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	51.58	89.90
Recency	8 June 2021	5 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	285 Watt

Pro W6800 has 14% lower power consumption.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 74.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6800 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.