GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6800 with GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6800
2021
32 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
51.42

RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms Pro W6800 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.63no data
Power efficiency14.1040.63
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21AD104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38407424
Core clock speed2075 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speed2320 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate556.8386.3
Floating-point processing power17.82 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs9680
TMUs240232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Cores6058

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6800 51.42
RTX 4080 Mobile 65.19
+26.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6800 19814
RTX 4080 Mobile 25121
+26.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro W6800 44404
RTX 4080 Mobile 57702
+29.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro W6800 82458
RTX 4080 Mobile 111294
+35%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro W6800 27937
RTX 4080 Mobile 41727
+49.4%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro W6800 92363
RTX 4080 Mobile 131005
+41.8%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro W6800 440592
RTX 4080 Mobile 703825
+59.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD155
−1.3%
157
+1.3%
1440p133
+27.9%
104
−27.9%
4K99
+41.4%
70
−41.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.51no data
1440p16.91no data
4K22.72no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−56.8%
149
+56.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−3.3%
90−95
+3.3%
Battlefield 5 160−170
−3%
160−170
+3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
−3%
100−110
+3%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−50.5%
143
+50.5%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−1.9%
100−110
+1.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−2.4%
120−130
+2.4%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−1.4%
210−220
+1.4%
Hitman 3 100−110
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−2.5%
200−210
+2.5%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−1.4%
140−150
+1.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−1.9%
110−120
+1.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200−210
−4%
200−210
+4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−0.7%
140−150
+0.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−3.3%
90−95
+3.3%
Battlefield 5 160−170
−3%
160−170
+3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
−3%
100−110
+3%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−30.5%
124
+30.5%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−1.9%
100−110
+1.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−2.4%
120−130
+2.4%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−1.4%
210−220
+1.4%
Hitman 3 100−110
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−2.5%
200−210
+2.5%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−1.4%
140−150
+1.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−1.9%
110−120
+1.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 277
−26.7%
351
+26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
−3.8%
110−120
+3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−0.7%
140−150
+0.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−31.1%
118
+31.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
−3%
100−110
+3%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−27.4%
121
+27.4%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−1.9%
100−110
+1.9%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−1.4%
210−220
+1.4%
Hitman 3 100−110
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 225
+9.2%
200−210
−9.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 268
−18.7%
318
+18.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 157
−9.6%
172
+9.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+30%
110
−30%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−1.9%
110−120
+1.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−3.8%
110−120
+3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−2.5%
80−85
+2.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−52.5%
93
+52.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−3.3%
60−65
+3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−74.5%
82
+74.5%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−3.3%
60−65
+3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
−1.1%
260−270
+1.1%
Hitman 3 70−75
−4.2%
70−75
+4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 179
+45.5%
120−130
−45.5%
Metro Exodus 55
−72.7%
95−100
+72.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 212
−11.8%
237
+11.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−68.7%
140
+68.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
−1.4%
220−230
+1.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−2.2%
90−95
+2.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−3.6%
55−60
+3.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−4.3%
45−50
+4.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
−2.3%
40−45
+2.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
−0.5%
211
+0.5%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−4.2%
75−80
+4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99
−18.2%
117
+18.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−52.8%
55
+52.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−5.7%
35−40
+5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−85.7%
39
+85.7%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−3%
30−35
+3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−3.9%
75−80
+3.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 126
+4.1%
121
−4.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−93.1%
56
+93.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−4.1%
50−55
+4.1%

This is how Pro W6800 and RTX 4080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 1% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6800 is 28% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6800 is 41% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6800 is 46% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 Mobile is 93% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6800 is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • RTX 4080 Mobile is ahead in 68 tests (94%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.42 65.19
Recency 8 June 2021 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 110 Watt

Pro W6800 has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 26.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6800 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6800
Radeon Pro W6800
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 82 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 628 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.