Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W6600X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600X with Quadro P5200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600X
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.99
+4.6%

Pro W6600X outperforms P5200 Max-Q by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking153166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation51.14no data
Power efficiency19.7422.64
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 23GP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date3 August 2021 (3 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482560
Core clock speed2068 MHz1316 MHz
Boost clock speed2479 MHz1569 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate317.3251.0
Floating-point processing power10.15 TFLOPS8.033 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128160
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1804 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s230.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6600X 33.99
+4.6%
P5200 Max-Q 32.48

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600X 13113
+4.7%
P5200 Max-Q 12530

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.99 32.48
Recency 3 August 2021 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 100 Watt

Pro W6600X has a 4.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

P5200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 20% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W6600X and Quadro P5200 Max-Q.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600X is a workstation card while Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
Radeon Pro W6600X
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 14 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.