GRID RTX T10-4 vs Radeon Pro W6600X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking165not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.49no data
Power efficiency19.43no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2021 (3 years ago)2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483584
Core clock speed2068 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed2479 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate317.3312.5
Floating-point processing power10.15 TFLOPS9.999 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Cores3256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 150 Watt

Pro W6600X has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6600X and GRID RTX T10-4. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
Radeon Pro W6600X
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-4
GRID RTX T10-4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID RTX T10-4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600X or GRID RTX T10-4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.