Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Radeon Pro W6600M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking219not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.98no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 23Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792640
Core clock speed1224 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate227.852.00
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS1.664 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs11240
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2021 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 45 Watt

Pro W6600M has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6600M and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 156 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.