GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5700 with GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

Pro W5700
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 205 Watt
38.53
+45.7%

Pro W5700 outperforms GTX 1650 SUPER by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking121211
Place by popularitynot in top-10057
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.47no data
Power efficiency12.9418.20
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 10TU116
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 November 2019 (5 years ago)22 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041280
Core clock speed1243 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate277.9138.0
Floating-point processing power8.893 TFLOPS4.416 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length305 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5700 38.53
+45.7%
GTX 1650 SUPER 26.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W5700 14812
+45.7%
GTX 1650 SUPER 10166

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+42.9%
70
−42.9%
1440p50−55
+38.9%
36
−38.9%
4K30−35
+30.4%
23
−30.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.99no data
1440p15.98no data
4K26.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 61
+0%
61
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%
Elden Ring 76
+0%
76
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+0%
121
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 115
+0%
115
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+0%
38
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Elden Ring 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+0%
101
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+0%
103
+0%
Metro Exodus 61
+0%
61
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
World of Tanks 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 191
+0%
191
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 83
+0%
83
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Elden Ring 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
World of Tanks 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Elden Ring 17
+0%
17
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Dota 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Pro W5700 and GTX 1650 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • Pro W5700 is 43% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W5700 is 39% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W5700 is 30% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.53 26.44
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 100 Watt

Pro W5700 has a 45.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1650 SUPER, on the other hand, has 105% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 95 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4828 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.