ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs Pro W5500M

Place in the ranking	484	1529
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	7.26	0.02
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	Navi 14	RV280
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	10 February 2020 (4 years ago)	1 May 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	no data
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	239 MHz
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	6,400 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	127.6	0.96
Floating-point processing power	4.083 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	88	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	164 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	5.248 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	8.1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5500M 9.00
+89900%

ATI 9200 PRO 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W5500M 3469
+173350%

ATI 9200 PRO 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.00	0.01
Recency	10 February 2020	1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	7 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	28 Watt

Pro W5500M has a 89900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 203.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.