Radeon R7 M275DX vs Pro W5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro W5500 Pro W5500X Pro W5700 Pro W5700X Pro W6400 Pro W6600 Pro W6600X Pro W6800 Pro W6800X Pro W6800X Duo Pro W6900X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M260 M260DX M260X M265 M265DX M270 M270DX M275DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5500 with Radeon R7 M275DX, including specs and performance data.

Pro W5500
2020, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
21.38
+592%

Pro W5500 outperforms R7 M275DX by a whopping 592% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro W5500 Pro W5500
R7 M275DX R7 M275DX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking297807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.90no data
Power efficiency13.17no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code nameNavi 14no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 February 2020 (6 years ago)4 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408896
Core clock speed1187 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data
Texture fill rate123.2no data
Floating-point processing power3.942 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs88no data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+567%
24
−567%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.49no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how Pro W5500 and R7 M275DX compete in popular games:

  • Pro W5500 is 567% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.38 3.09
Recency 10 February 2020 4 June 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm

Pro W5500 has a 592% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M275DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 M275DX is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
HD 8790M Radeon HD 8790M
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
Maxwell GPU Surface Book Maxwell GPU Surface Book
vs
HD 6450 GDDR5 HD 6450 GDDR5
RX Vega 2 Radeon RX Vega 2
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI
RX Vega 2 Radeon RX Vega 2
vs
UHD Graphics G4 Graphics G4
Playstation 5 GPU Playstation 5 GPU
vs
RTX 3070 16 GB RTX 3070 16 GB
Playstation 5 GPU Playstation 5 GPU
vs
H100 PCIe 80 GB PCIe 80 GB
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
R7 M260X R7 M260X
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
GT 730A GT 730A
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
W4150M FirePro W4150M
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
R7 M265DX R7 M265DX
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
R7 M270DX R7 M270DX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 91 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M275DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500 or Radeon R7 M275DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.