Radeon RX 590 GME vs Pro Vega II Duo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.92no data
Power efficiency5.32no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameVega 20Polaris 20
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)9 March 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962304
Core clock speed1400 MHz1257 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHz1420 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)475 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate440.3204.5
Floating-point processing power14.09 TFLOPS6.543 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs256144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
WidthQuad-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.02 TB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2019 9 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 475 Watt 175 Watt

Pro Vega II Duo has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

RX 590 GME, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and Radeon RX 590 GME. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 590 GME is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
Radeon RX 590 GME

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 182 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 528 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 GME on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.