Radeon R5 A220 vs Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking202not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.50no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameVega 10Caicos
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096160
Core clock speed1250 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate345.66.200
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs2568
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 35 Watt

Pro Vega 64 has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

R5 A220, on the other hand, has 614% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon R5 A220. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 A220 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 36 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or Radeon R5 A220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.